首页> 外文OA文献 >A 'happiness test' for the new measures of national well-being: how much better than GDP are they?
【2h】

A 'happiness test' for the new measures of national well-being: how much better than GDP are they?

机译:对国民福祉的新衡量标准的“幸福测试”:它们比GDP好多少?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Across the globe there is growing skepticism about the usefulness of GDP as a measure of national well-being. Consequently, several alternative quality-of-life (QOL) measures were developed which either aim at healing the GDP, complementing it, or replacing it. This chapter portrays some of these new measures and puts them to a happiness test: compared to the GDP, are the new QOL measures better able to capture what makes people happy and satisfied with their lives? Using data for 34 OECD societies, we can show that from a happiness perspective, there is-surprisingly-little wrong with the GDP, and most alternative QOL measures do not outperform GDP. Yet, one measure actually does a better job: the OECD's Better Life Index which is particularly effective when it comes to predicting subjective well-being in the richest OECD countries. In sum, the chapter demonstrates that a happiness perspective can add important insights along the way to facilitate the search for a new, widely accepted, internationally comparable measure of well-being. (author's abstract)
机译:在全球范围内,越来越多的人开始怀疑国内生产总值是否可作为衡量国家福祉的指标。因此,开发了几种替代性的生活质量(QOL)措施,旨在改善GDP,补充GDP或替代GDP。本章介绍了其中的一些新措施,并进行了幸福度测试:与GDP相比,新的QOL措施是否能够更好地把握使人们对生活感到满意和满意的原因?使用来自34个经合组织国家的数据,我们可以证明,从幸福的角度来看,GDP存在令人惊讶的小错误,而且大多数替代性QOL措施都不能超过GDP。然而,一项措施实际上做得更好:OECD的“更好的生活指数”在预测最富有的OECD国家的主观幸福感时特别有效。总而言之,本章表明,幸福的观点可以在促进探索新的,广泛接受的,国际可比的幸福感的过程中增加重要的见解。 (作者的摘要)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号